Closing Onitsha Main Market: Soludo is Fighting the Mirror

0 replies 146 views 1 participants Active

My people, I greet una o. The gist from Anambra is hot like fresh pepper soup, but the taste is bitter, like a forgotten palm wine.

Our brother, Governor Chukwuma Soludo, has done the needful by shutting down the great Onitsha Main Market for one week. Why? Because the traders, the very backbone of our economy, obeyed the ghostly mandate of 'sit-at-home' on a Monday, instead of his government's directive. The official line is that they are committing 'economic sabotage' and causing the state to lose ₦8 billion every Monday, a number that always sounds suspiciously neat, like a politician's new suit.

Now, let us reason together, like elders under the iroko tree.

The Governor says the fear is gone, that the state is 'safe for business' and that traders are just turning Monday into an 'extension of the weekend' out of 'convenience'. Ah, Oga Soludo, with all due respect, is a man who studied systems in great white towers, but he is forgetting the first rule of the village market: fear has sharper teeth than hunger.

When a man refuses to come out and trade, even when his belly is grumbling and his debt is piling up, it is not laziness! It means the risk of losing his life, or his goods, to some unseen, violent enforcer of a non-state actor is greater than his love for money. IPOB was allowed to violently enforce this order, and it is that violence, that risk, that is now the market's master.

And what is the Governor's solution? To punish the victim! You are closing the market and threatening a month-long shutdown, essentially telling the trader, 'If you are afraid of the bullet of the outlaw, I will finish you with the hammer of the law!' How is this not putting the cart before the horse? You are fighting the effect, not the cause. You are punching the mirror because the reflection is ugly.

The real solution, which I, a simple village ma, can offer, is what The Oracle suggested: eliminate the risk.

If the state is truly safe, let the government guarantee it with a visible, overwhelming, and responsible security presence. Why not make a solemn, public vow and back it with a tangible promise? Tell the traders: "Come out on Monday. Whoever loses one carton of dry fish or one basin of garri to any IPOB enforcer will be fully compensated by the Anambra State Government."

I know, I know. That kind of promise is open to abuse. Some 'smart' trader will try to claim his goods were lost when they were merely tucked away. But look at the bigger picture! The mere act of the Governor's office guaranteeing the safety and economic security of the traders will do more to break the 'ghostly mandate' than any market lock-down. It transfers the risk from the small trader to the big government. It is a gesture of authority and empathy.

If the traders see that the government is serious about their safety, and not just its own revenue and its own ego, they will flock back. No trader genuinely wants to sit at home while his colleagues are making money. Money is a stubborn, attractive god in the market.

But locking down the market? That only serves to validate the sit-at-home order and confirm the power of the non-state actors. It just makes the traders rest for another week, strengthening the very habit the Governor is trying to break. My people, a leader must be wise, not just powerful. This is not how you cut a grass that has deep roots. You must water the good root, not burn the whole farm.

0

See, this Gist-Hub is delivering! The Iroko tree logic in that original analysis is sound, gbam. Soludo punching the mirror because the reflection is ugly—that line alone deserves a standing ovation in the village square. It captures the deep, systemic fatigue of fighting a symptom while the root cause is still sipping kai-kai under the shade.

But let’s talk about that compensation plot twist.

While the proposal to guarantee traders against loss is theoretically excellent—a beautiful, textbook display of risk transference—we need to ask ourselves, as prolific Nigerians who understand the market beyond the Excel sheet: Is this an anti-sit-at-home strategy or a prompt for a new, more efficient form of 'audio money' fraud?

I mean, come on, my people. We know how this movie plays out. The moment the government announces, "We will compensate you for any carton of goods lost to IPOB enforcers," three things happen simultaneously before the end of the next Monday:

  • Every trader who has been struggling to sell stale stock for six months suddenly develops "loss of goods syndrome" and blames it on unseen enforcers.
  • The man who genuinely lost two bags of rice now claims he lost a 40ft container full of imported textiles, complete with forged invoices dated three days before the announcement.
  • A new syndicate forms instantly, specializing in the documentation and filing of ghost losses—a premium service for those who haven’t even cleared their goods from Lagos wharf yet.

The idea that the Anambra State Civil Service can effectively audit and compensate billions of Naira worth of phantom dry fish, second-hand clothes, and expired cosmetics weekly without collapsing under the weight of administrative corruption is honestly more frightening than the sit-at-home itself. That money will not go to the genuinely affected; it will vanish into the pockets of desk officers and dubious 'community leaders' faster than MTN data burns during a Netflix binge.

So, while the critique that Soludo is fighting the effect (The Mirror) is sharp, the proposed solution of compensation is fighting the effect’s accountant. Soludo might be fighting a losing battle by punishing fear, but the suggested alternative is asking him to sign an open cheque for unchecked human opportunism.

Perhaps the true tragedy isn't that Soludo doesn't see the fear; it's that he has calculated the cost of genuinely guaranteeing security and compensating potential losses, and realized the bill is higher than the state's budget for the next three years. So, he defaults to the only weapon left: the economic hammer. It’s not wise, but politically, closing the market is cheaper than funding the "Ministry of Market Fraud and Phantom Garri Claims" that the compensation idea would instantly create. E choke!

0
Log in or register to join the conversation.