The Theatre of Protest and the Shadow of Corruption
Now, in the courts and on the streets, there appeared multitudes of placard-bearers, singing and dancing in support of the king, Tinubu, their voices raised in choreographed merriment.
These were the king’s faithful, orchestrated to display joy and loyalty, though their hearts and motives were oft questioned by the multitude, and many whispered of hired hands and rented crowds.
Some said, “These are but actors, hired to perform before the eyes of the world, for a paltry sum of naira, that the king’s reign may appear blessed and accepted by all, even as the people suffer in silence.”
Yet, the scribes confirmed that such spectacles were not new in the kingdom, for the king’s supporters had long occupied the courthouse environs and public spaces, their presence a constant chorus in the theatre of politics, designed to sway public opinion and influence judicial outcomes.
In the midst of these things, the tale of Ganduje, the son of Kano, echoed through the land, for it was a story of brazen acquisition of wealth.
For Ganduje, now a mighty man in the king’s court, having relinquished his chairmanship of the king’s party amidst whispers of a cold war and damaged credibility, was seen in secret chambers, receiving wads of dollars and stuffing them into his robes, a vision captured by the seer Jafaar Jafaar.
The giver of the bribe was a great contractor, and the dollars flowed like a river into Ganduje’s pocket, while the people watched in despair, for their own pockets were empty.
When the vision was revealed to all, Ganduje denied all, seeking refuge in the courts and pleading for the judges to shield him from the hounds of justice, claiming immunity and seeking injunctions.
Yet, the commission of complaints declared the vision true through forensic analysis, confirming its authenticity. And the people cried, “Shame upon the mighty!” as Ganduje, despite the weight of the allegations, rose to become a chief in the king’s party, his past seemingly no hindrance to his ascent.
The Senate, meanwhile, was beset by fresh scandals, for it was revealed by the civic-tech scribes of BudgIT that lawmakers demanded great sums from the universities and other institutions of learning, seeking gold to approve the budgets of learning and public service, inflating them with projects not aligned with national priorities.
Thus, the house of elders, meant to be a bastion of legislative integrity, became a market of bribes and kickbacks, and the dreams of scholars and the progress of the nation were sold for silver and ill-gotten gains.
In this season of great unveiling, the sons of ink, David and Fisayo, and Dele, chronicled these deeds with relentless vigour, publishing them for all to see in the digital scrolls and on the wireless waves, though the mighty sought to silence their pens and dim their light.
Oby, Natasha, and the other women of courage, whose names were not all written, stood against the tide of injustice, demanding equity, accountability, and a rightful place at the table of power for all, not just the privileged.
The fake protesters, orchestrated by the king’s men and their loyalists, continued to dance in the streets, their hollow songs masking the genuine cries of the suffering multitude, a stark contrast between manufactured joy and real pain.
The people wondered, as they scrolled through their digital feeds and listened to the whispers on the wind, “Who shall deliver us from this theatre of deceit, where the actors are many but the truth is scarce, and where justice is oft delayed or denied?”
