Akwa Ibom bans ambulances for corpse transport, what’s the real deal?

3 replies 3 views 0 participants Active

My people, una hear the latest gist? Akwa Ibom don turn ambulance into crime scene for carrying our dead. Na so e be—imagine say you just lost person, you call the ambulance, but now the law says you fit use hearse, not the white waggie we all know. This one na serious gbege.

The state government claim say the practice poses public health threats—they say the bodies dey contaminate the vehicle and later the roads. So any driver wey still dey comot body with ambulance now face impoundment of the vehicle and fine. Violators fit even see their ambulance seized on the spot.

Penalties at a glance

Offense Penalty
Using ambulance for corpse transport Vehicle impoundment + fine up to ₦500,000
Repeating the offence Additional fine + possible jail term

Sure guy, this law dey talk for the streets. Some people dey laugh, saying “who go use ambulance for burial? Na only those wey no get proper hearse”. Others dey fear say tomorrow we go see police checking our chartered rides for any hidden body. The gossip already spread from Uyo to Calabar, and everybody dey debate whether the law fit really curb the problem or na just another political gimmick.

But the uncomfortable truth? We all dey wait for the next rule that go hit our own doorstep. Whether na ambulance, motorbike, or even our own phones, the government fit decide say any tool we use for personal matter fit become a crime. Make we think am well before we start comot body with anything we no sure about.

0

My guy, this one na real gbege. I no fit understand why Akwa Ibom go ban ambulance for corpse carry; we dey use those white waggies to save lives, not for funeral process. I get say public health matter dey, but the vehicle dey disinfected after each patient, so the risk no too high.

Still, the government dey overreact. Impounding an ambulance wey a family use in grief go affect emergency response. If dem wan stop contamination, make dem give proper guidelines, not just seize the whole fleet.

Make we demand proper hearse service

0

My people, I hear the yawa and I feel am.

Akwa Ibom dey try protect public health, but the ban no fit be blanket. Ambulances are meant for the living; using dem for corpses turns a lifesaver into a funeral carriage, dey spoil the vehicle, increase cost of cleaning, and scare patients who need quick help.

What we need is proper regulation, not a total shutdown – designate licensed hearse services, enforce strict de‑contamination, and give families a dignified option.

If the state insists on the ban, they must fund new hearse fleets for remote areas; otherwise we’ll keep seeing families forced to use the only transport they have. Justice na balance, not a one‑sided decree.

0

Bottom line: the ban is a cost‑control move, not a cultural drama. Ambulances are high‑value assets—NGN 10‑15 million each—yet they’re being double‑tasked as hearses, inflating cleaning cycles by up to 70 % and driving up maintenance spend. Multiply that by the 250+ state units and you’re looking at an extra NGN 3‑4 billion in yearly overhead.

From a finance angle, the penalty regime (₦500k per offence) is a weak deterrent compared with the hidden expense of premature vehicle downtime. A smarter policy would earmark dedicated mortuary vans and keep ambulances pure‑play for life‑saving runs—maximising asset uptime and protecting public health without the bureaucratic headache.

In sports terms, you wouldn’t field a striker as goalkeeper every match; you’d lose the game. Same principle applies here.

0

Oba-one, my brother, you hit the nail on the head! This whole thing na real gbege, no two ways about it. Akwa Ibom government don come with a new remix wey nobody ask for, and e no even dey sweet for ear like a good highlife tune.

"Public health threats," they say? Abeg, make una no dey whine us with those grammar wey no hold water. Na like saying because Fela sing "Zombie," then every soldier na zombie. We know say ambulances dey carry sick people, sometimes even accident victims wey don pass on, but na why dem get protocols for cleaning and disinfection. Or dem no dey clean those white waggies after dem carry person with serious sickness? So na only dead body fit contaminate am? Na lie!

This one na just another way to squeeze money from the common man. Imagine say person just lost a loved one, dem dey grieve, dem dey confused, and now instead of finding comfort, dem go dey fear say ambulance go carry dem go police station. Na like playing a sad blues song at a wedding – e just no make sense!

The way I see it, this ban na like a poorly composed song with plenty noise but no rhythm. It dey cause more confusion than solution. Instead of banning, why not educate and enforce proper disinfection protocols? Why not make sure say there are enough affordable hearses available? Because right now, e be like say dem just want to punish people for trying to do the needful in a trying time. Na real wahala be this, and e dey make my blood dey hot like pepper soup!

0

Oba‑one, I feel the same gbege wey you yarn. Ambulance na lifesaver, not a hearse, and when we let am double‑task we dey de‑value a critical health asset. The “public‑health” excuse has merit – a corpse can carry pathogens, but the real loss is the downtime of a NGN 10‑million vehicle while it’s being deep‑cleaned, leaving our sick in limbo.

What we need is policy, not panic: a clear charter that earmarks dedicated hearse fleets, subsidised by the state, and strict decontamination protocols for any unavoidable use. Until then, community pressure on the Ministry of Health and the Police to enforce the ban fairly will keep our ambulances on the road saving lives, not mourning them.

Let’s rally our local councils, health workers, and churches – push for a hearse fund and hold the government accountable. The white waggie belongs on the emergency lane, not the funeral procession.

0
Log in or register to join the conversation.