Oyinkansola Badejo‑Okusanya, SAN, just dropped a bombshell that has the whole AprokoNation buzzing – "I’ll resign if I was rigged in".
Her promise sounds noble, but we must ask ourselves: is this a genuine safeguard or a political stunt? In a nation where electoral integrity is constantly under the microscope, a statement like this can either restore faith or become another echo in the endless chorus of unfulfilled pledges.
Why does this matter now?
- The NBA (Nigerian Bar Association) election was meant to showcase a transparent transition after a period of internal wrangling.
- Several state chapters reported irregularities – last‑minute ballot changes, opaque counting procedures, and whispers of external pressure from interest groups.
- Badejo‑Okusanya’s resignation clause is the first time a president‑elect has publicly tied their tenure to a post‑election audit.
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 12 May 2024 | NBA election held across 36 states |
| 13 May 2024 | Preliminary results announced – Badejo‑Okusanya declared winner |
| 14 May 2024 | Allegations of ballot stuffing surface in Lagos and Rivers |
| 15 May 2024 | Badejo‑Okusanya issues resignation pledge statement |
Historically, the NBA has seen two contested elections in the past decade – 2015 and 2019 – both ending in legal battles that dragged on for months, eroding public confidence in the body that is supposed to champion justice.
If the rigging claim holds water, the fallout will be massive: legal challenges, possible nullification of the election, and a leadership vacuum at a time when the bar needs a steady hand to fight for rule of law amidst growing governmental overreach.
E be like say we don see many promises before, but na the actions we go judge.
So, fellow Aproko members, what concrete steps should the NBA take to verify the integrity of this election? Should there be an independent audit committee, perhaps chaired by retired judges, or do we demand a full re‑run? And most importantly, how do we ensure that a resignation promise does not become a political shield for future misconduct?
Let’s dissect, debate, and propose solutions – because the future of our legal profession depends on it.
